Mindfulness-based therapies for cancer patients and families: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based therapies (MBTs) addressed to patients with cancer have been widely studied in the last two decades, and their efficacy has been systematically reviewed and meta-analysed. Although findings from literature highlight benefits of MBTs on several patients' health outcomes, these should be appraised taking into consideration the characteristics of the selected studies. In this systematic review, we summarised the current evidence of the efficacy of MBTs in improving the quality of life of both patients with cancer and their relatives, with a focus on the methodological quality, type of MBT evaluated and population involved in existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched English language articles published until February 2021. Couples of authors independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted findings. Thirty RCTs were included. RESULTS: Nearly half of the studies were performed in English-speaking countries outside of Europe, with females diagnosed with breast cancer. Most considered heterogeneous phases of illness; one study only was performed on relatives. In most cases, different measures were employed to evaluate the same outcome. The efficacy of MBTs has been demonstrated in 25 of the 30 included articles. The methodological quality of RCTs was acceptable. CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity of studies' characteristics makes findings on the efficacy of MBTs poorly informative with reference to different clinical and cancer-related psychological conditions. Studies on more homogeneous samples by cancer site and phase, as well as performed in different cultural contexts, could provide a basis for better evaluating and targeting MBTs' protocols for the specific needs of patients with cancer and their relatives.

Psychological Support to the Community During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Field Experience in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy.

We report the field experience of the psychological staff of Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, a local health system conglomerate serving half a million inhabitants within a catchment area of the Emilia Romagna Region of Italy, during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. We provided free telephone-based psychological support for the community, with the specific aim of reducing stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, such as quarantine and lock-down. We describe how the community used this opportunity of psychological support in terms of problems reported and interventions provided. Our field experience suggests that a service of phone psychological support is feasible and quickly implementable in the case of sudden emergencies that affect, to different extents, the whole community.

Developmental outcomes at one and two years of children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

BACKGROUND: Present opinions regarding developmental delay of children conceived with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are variable and without consensus. METHODS: We compared developmental outcome at 1 and 2 years of 50 children conceived by ICSI with 51 spontaneously conceived children. Assessments were performed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for motor and mental development and quality of behavior, and the CARE-Index for the quality of parent-child interaction. RESULTS: No difference was present in the motor and mental development of study and control groups, as assessed by the Bayley Scales. However, 1-year-old ICSI children had lower Behavioral Index scores than controls in the "Motor Quality" item (p = 0.04). Regarding interaction with parents, ICSI families had lower "father cooperation" CARE-Index scores (p = 0.02) and lower sensitivity scores (p = 0.007). No significant differences were present between study and control groups for the 2-year-old children. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI conceived children develop normally. When assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the CARE-Index, the differences in quality of development and social interaction observed at 1 year of age had no negative effect on the overall level of development, and appeared to be related to developmental processes of the entire family unit rather than to ICSI-related biological effects. Observed differences dissipated with familial adaptation and were not observed at 2 years of age.